During the performance work statement development, which individuals are prohibited from participating?

During the development of a performance work statement (PWS), it is crucial to ensure that the input and guidance come from individuals who can objectively contribute to the project without conflicts of interest that could influence the outcomes. Program managers are often involved in overseeing the execution of contracts and may have vested interests in the results of the performance work statement. Their participation could skew the development process, as they might prioritize their objectives over the project needs or adhere to a specific agenda.

The development of a PWS generally requires a focus on technical and functional specifications that define the work to be performed. It is essential for individual contributors during this phase to provide unbiased, clear, and objective recommendations without the influence of personal interests or organizational biases that program managers may carry. This helps in maintaining the integrity and effectiveness of the PWS in serving its intended purpose.

The other groups, such as agency team members, external consultants, and public representatives, typically bring relevant expertise and diverse perspectives that can enhance the quality and precision of the performance work statement, making their involvement not only permissible but often beneficial.